Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael Clary's avatar

I thank you for your respectful engagement. I'm pressed for time so please forgive me if my responses seem curt. I'm responding in a bit of a rush.

1. If the Supreme court decides marrying your dog is a true marriage, would you still say that "dog marriage" actually exists? It isn't shaky ground. God's word is sufficient for defining reality. SCOTUS has no jurisdiction here.

2. Again, God defines marriage, not the state or SCOTUS or popular opinion. It is a lie regarding of what anyone says because it opposes God's word.

3. You fail to distinguish a wedding from just any other meal. No one is saying grandma shouldn't share a meal with her grandson. Jesus did the same. But attending a wedding is not the same as eating with tax collectors and sinners. Weddings are significant events and attenders are there to celebrate with approval.

4. The time absolutely matters. Men of Issachar "understood the times."

It sounds like you're tempted to think subjectively about the situation at hand. There is a "right and wrong" set of answers, but those answers are uncomfortable and costly. You mention being shrewd about continuing her witness. The obsession about our public witness to unbelievers may very well be fear of man dressed up as missional zeal. Be careful about this. God bless.

Expand full comment
Jim McCraigh's avatar

Michael,

This is the best post I have read to date on the Begg/Compassion issue. You were correct when you wrote... "This sends a confusing message about Christian truth at precisely the urgent moment where utmost clarity is needed. Further, it lends credibility to radical LGBTQ activist’s desires to remake Christian morality into the ethic of Sodom."

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts